|
Minority card vs Development Card | |||
| Published on January 17th, 2008 In Uncategorized, Blogging, Careers-Life, News, Parties, Politics | Views 328 | ||||
|
‘Quota for minorities being considered’ said Shivraj Patil on Jan 16. Opposite to this Chh’garh CM with the presence of various CMs of BJP launched Rs 3 per kg rice to BPL scheme to play the development cards to learn the lesson from its victory in
Opposite to this Congress through Shivraj Patil throw again the google of minority card. Another card of Congress is ‘divide Uttar Pradesh’. As reported by media ‘Quota for minorities being considered’ said by Shivraj Patil on Jan 16. He evoked minority community against equal opportunity for all, to say in State Minority Conference that the government was exploring the possibility of providing reservation to minorities in educational institutions and jobs. As for the definition of ‘minority’ — a contentious issue in several States — Mr. Singh was guarded, stating that it was defined in the national perspective with inputs from States for the benefit of precision. However, he refused to elaborate saying that it could generate a controversy. Means Congress led UPA Government has no definition of Minority. Allahabad HC said Muslims not minorities in UP: TN Andhra for Religious Quotahttp://www.newsanalysisindia.com/105042007.htm They have freedom to define ‘Minority’, ‘Secularism and ‘tainted’ etc according to their convenience. Our elections are fought on the basis of caste, creed, group, religion, and money and muscle power. It is difficult to stop tainted persons from fighting elections when we can’t even define who is tainted and who is not. So called seculars say these are seculars and those are not seculars. Though there is no definition of secularism. Every one defines it as per his convenience. The term “tainted” should be defined through a bill passed by 3/4th majority of the parliament, approved by the President and thereafter taught politicians the meaning in a language that they can understand. It is a shame that people at large know its meaning but politicians do not. SC asked: Can President refuse oath to a tainted ministerhttp://www.newsanalysisindia.com/319022007.htm Talking about secularism Modi described how its definition had morphed along the years. “There was a time when secularism meant religious harmony, later it became lip sympathy to the minorities, and then appeasement of minorities…As for me development is the strongest foundation of secularism as it would benefit the poorest of the poor,” Modi said inviting a huge applause in Kamraj hall of Chennai.Congress, Left and DMK trio deceived K Kamraj and Mahatma Gandhi.Kamraj vs Gandhi Dynastyhttp://www.newsanalysisindia.com/114012008.htm Souls of them may also punish trio. Slavish Congress: Fools Martyrs Traitorshttp://www.newsanalysisindia.com/121112007.htm Congress high command and cabinet of Manmoan Singh is still in the grip of merchant of death.Saffron Waves Guj to TN: Modi-Challenge again to Soniahttp://www.newsanalysisindia.com/113012008 Thuglak Editor Cho Ramaswamy surmised it all when he invited Modi to the stage in Kamraj hall with the words, “I welcome the merchant of death to – corruption, official apathy, terrorism, darkness and despair.” The cheers reached a roaring crescendo. By Premendra Agrawal |
||||
| ||||
|
| ||||
|
|
||||




